Making Inferences Concerning Physiological Responses: A Reply to Rossiter, Silberstein, Harris and Nield

This article comments on 'Brain-imaging detection of visual scene encoding …' by Rossiter et al (2001), and proposes considerable caution before accepting their conclusions.

Making Inferences Concerning Physiological Responses: A Reply to Rossiter, Silberstein, Harris, and Nield

Stephen L. Crites, Jr.andShelley N. Aikman-EckenrodeUniversity of Texas at El Paso

Rossiter et al. (2001) present some intriguing data, but it seems appropriate to take a close look at their results and conclusions before everyone scraps paper-and-pencil memory measures and invests in equipment for recording electrical brain activity. At its core, their study is fairly simple. First, participants see a sequence of stimuli. Second, the researchers record and examine physiological responses (steady-state visually evoked potentials, or SSVEPs) associated with these stimuli. Third,...

Not a subscriber?

Schedule your live demo with our team today

WARC helps you to plan, create and deliver more effective marketing

  • Prove your case and back-up your idea

  • Get expert guidance on strategic challenges

  • Tackle current and emerging marketing themes

We’re long-term subscribers to WARC and it’s a tool we use extensively. We use it to source case studies and best practice for the purposes of internal training, as well as for putting persuasive cases to clients. In compiling a recent case for long-term, sustained investment in brand, we were able to support key marketing principles with numerous case studies sourced from WARC. It helped bring what could have been a relatively dry deck to life with recognisable brand successes from across a broad number of categories. It’s incredibly efficient to have such a wealth of insight in one place.

Insights Team
Bray Leino

You’re in good company

We work with 80% of Forbes' most valuable brands* and 80% of the world's top top-of-the-class agencies.

* Top 10 brands