Frequency: How much is too much?
This article is part of a series of articles on frequency. Read more.
In an age of multi-channel media planning, shorter consumer attention spans and ad avoidance, marketers and their agencies need to think hard about the issue of frequency when designing media strategies. Too little and the campaign risks having no impact, too much and advertisers are likely to be wasting money. And while it is true that even a perfect advertising schedule is not going to make an ineffective ad effective, it is also true that good scheduling can improve the payback of a campaign.
There has been widespread debate since the 1970s about whether a low-frequency, high-reach strategy is better than a high-frequency lower-reach one. This debate has intensified in recent years with the balance tipping towards the former approach.
In this article, we look at:
- The history of frequency theory;
- What history can teach us today.
Need to know
What else does this article talk about?
- Recall & recognition
- TV effectiveness
- Reach and frequency, recency
- Theories & ideas of media planning
Interested in seeing what other marketing challenges WARC covers?
WARC’s coverage is unrivalled – grouping articles, case studies and research around 100 different marketing topics, arranged across 11 themes.
What do I get with WARC?
- 65,000+ articles covering the full spectrum of marketing communications.
- Including over 12,000 effectiveness case studies revealing the campaign strategies of the world's leading brands to help maximize ROI.
- Best practice guides that explain the how and why of marketing challenges to stay ahead of the ever-changing marketing landscape.
- Marketing intelligence, trend reports, brand profiles and event reports to give your brand clear competitive advantage.