China demands interoperability of its messaging giants | WARC | The Feed

China demands interoperability of its messaging giants

The Chinese government has instructed some of its largest tech firms, including Tencent and Alibaba that they must not block each other’s services, according to reports.

Why it matters

The news follows other high profile measures that have made international headlines as the government brings some of its largest companies and cultural exports under control with stricter rules on data protection, fintech, influencers and antitrust.

These latest rules seek to target some of the techniques that entrenched market leaders have used – such as blocking competitor links in dominant messaging services – in order to strengthen the walls of each individual garden. The logic here is that it is both bad for the market and bad for consumers, whose choices are restricted.

What’s happening

• First reported by the 21st Century Business Herald and picked up in Channel News Asia, unnamed sources explain that the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has now issued an ultimatum at a meeting last week that it would resort to strict measures if companies do not comply of their own accord.
• China’s tech giants, including Alibaba, Tencent, ByteDance, Baidu, Huawei, and Xiaomi, who were all said to be at the meeting are not waiting around – earlier this summer it seems both Alibaba and Tencent saw the writing was on the wall.
• Now they have formally announced that they are complying, telling the world’s press that the two “resolutely support” the Ministry’s decision and would implement in phases.
• Initially, Alibaba’s Taobao and Tmall marketplaces will allow Tencent’s payment system WeChat Pay, which competes directly with Alipay.

It’s not that simple

Interoperability doesn’t immediately lead to a more open market. Taking two giants and making them work together forcibly could well have echoes of the alleged “sweetheart deal” said to be struck by Facebook and Google in which one appeared to stop a potential competitor product in return for preferential terms with the other.

While there may be competitor products, it’s more likely that the pair will work out how to play to each other’s strengths, using the other’s superior product without having to copy each other.

Sourced from Channel News Asia, WSJ, FT, WARC, Rest of World