Comparing respondents who passed versus failed an Instructional Manipulation Check: A case study about support for climate change policies

The presence of satisficers among survey respondents threatens survey data quality. To identify such respondents, Oppenheimer et al.

Introduction

Krosnick's (1991) theory of satisficing stated that respondents, to reduce the cognitive efforts required to answer surveys, use shortcuts such as skimming the instructions and questions, or choosing the first acceptable answer. These behaviors might reduce survey data quality.

To identify satisficers among survey respondents, Oppenheimer et al. (2009) developed the Instructional Manipulation Check (IMC). It consists of a request for an answer with a similar structure and answer scale to the rest of the survey requests. Nevertheless, the IMC "asks to ignore the standard response format and instead provide a confirmation that they [respondents] have read the instruction"...

Not a subscriber?

Schedule your live demo with our team today

WARC helps you to plan, create and deliver more effective marketing

  • Prove your case and back-up your idea

  • Get expert guidance on strategic challenges

  • Tackle current and emerging marketing themes

We’re long-term subscribers to WARC and it’s a tool we use extensively. We use it to source case studies and best practice for the purposes of internal training, as well as for putting persuasive cases to clients. In compiling a recent case for long-term, sustained investment in brand, we were able to support key marketing principles with numerous case studies sourced from WARC. It helped bring what could have been a relatively dry deck to life with recognisable brand successes from across a broad number of categories. It’s incredibly efficient to have such a wealth of insight in one place.

Insights Team
Bray Leino

You’re in good company

We work with 80% of Forbes' most valuable brands* and 80% of the world's top top-of-the-class agencies.

* Top 10 brands