THE LATEST ISSUE of the Consumers' Association magazine Which?condemns many personal pensions as a 'rip-off', citing certain endowment policies that yield lower returns than savings accounts. Which? also accuses managers of PEPs and unit trusts of under-performing the stock market. CA's research shows that personal pension-holders typically pay four times as much in charges as members of occupational schemes. Says CA director Sheila McKechnie: 'We can't think of another major industry where consumers get such a raw deal or where companies get away with selling such poor products.'Philip Warland, director-general of the Association of Unit Trusts and Investment Funds stoutly defended his members, pointing-out that not all UK general PEPs aim to compete with the market because 'what their investors want is a low-risk product, and by definition a low-risk product will have a lower return than the market'.
© Copyright 2017
All rights reserved including database rights. This electronic file is for the personal use of authorised users based at the subscribing company's office location. It may not be reproduced, posted on intranets, extranets or the internet, e-mailed, archived or shared electronically either within the purchaser's organisation or externally without express written permission from WARC.