Are our Ways of Evaluating Advertising too Restrictive?

This paper argues that some ways of evaluating advertising undervalue its contribution to the bottom line, and forget the fact that manufacturers advertise to protect or improve the long run cash flow that a brand produces.

Are our Ways of Evaluating Advertising too Restrictive?

Simon BroadbentLeo Burnett

This paper argues that some ways of evaluating advertising – though currently popular and apparently scientific – undervalue its contribution to the bottom line. Manufacturers advertise to protect or improve the long run cash flow that the brand produces, but this is often forgotten when the evaluation is carried out.

I am not discussing here the evaluations done to improve our understanding of how the campaign worked, but those which attempt to make advertising more accountable, to estimate what return we got on our investment, and...

Not a subscriber?

Schedule your live demo with our team today

WARC helps you to plan, create and deliver more effective marketing

  • Prove your case and back-up your idea

  • Get expert guidance on strategic challenges

  • Tackle current and emerging marketing themes

We’re long-term subscribers to WARC and it’s a tool we use extensively. We use it to source case studies and best practice for the purposes of internal training, as well as for putting persuasive cases to clients. In compiling a recent case for long-term, sustained investment in brand, we were able to support key marketing principles with numerous case studies sourced from WARC. It helped bring what could have been a relatively dry deck to life with recognisable brand successes from across a broad number of categories. It’s incredibly efficient to have such a wealth of insight in one place.

Insights Team
Bray Leino

You’re in good company

We work with 80% of Forbes' most valuable brands* and 80% of the world's top top-of-the-class agencies.

* Top 10 brands