Questioning techniques: Scales

 

Previous pageNext pagePage 1 of 1


all[21]papers[21]cases[0]news[0]classics[0]
Sort by:
 Date      Most read
Narrow by:
Search within results:
Start searching...
Reset search
Print  |  Email  |  Add to My Folder
My preferred format is HTML  |  Change to PDF

Paper
1.
A maximum difference scaling application for customer satisfaction researchers
Michael S. Garver, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 51, Issue 4, 2009, pp.481-500
This paper puts forth maximum difference scaling as a valid research method to determine attribute importance for customer satisfaction research, which in turn can drive valid and meaningful need-base ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
2.
You can't judge a book by its cover! A way to tackle the severe acquiescence bias among Arab respondents
Arun Joshi, Sagar Tamang and Himanshu Vashisthaz, ESOMAR, Annual Congress, Montreal, September 2008
This paper proposes a new research technique to resolve the issue of severe acquiescence bias (a systematic bias caused by some respondents tending to agree with whatever is presented to them) often s ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
3.
Customer advocacy metrics: the NPS theory in practice
Justin Kirby and Alain Samson, Admap, February 2008, Issue 491, pp.17-19
The practical value of the NPS (Net Promoter Score) customer loyalty metric has been hotly debated. The NPS is based on a single question - 'would you recommend X to a friend or colleague' - on a scal ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
4.
Maximizing respondent engagement: the use of rich media
Jennifer Reid, Monique Morden and Angus Reid, ESOMAR, Annual Congress, Berlin, September 2007
This paper outlines the results of a quantitative study using a split sample design to demonstrate increased respondent engagement and better data quality from Fusion surveys (online surveys incorpora ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
User rating:
Paper
5.
Truth in measurement: comparing web-based interviewing techniques
Randall Thomas, Mick P. Couper, John Bremer and George Terhanian, ESOMAR, Annual Congress, Berlin, September 2007
This paper reviews a number of studies that have examined visual, interactive tasks in online surveys in comparison to other verbal, and less interactive, alternatives. In many cases, while the respon ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
6.
Simple rating scale formats: exploring extreme response
Gerald Albaum, Catherine Roster, Julie H. Yu and Robert D. Rogers, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 49, No. 5, 2007
The usual simple rating scale purports to measure direction (important/unimportant, effective/ineffective, etc.) and intensity (very, somewhat) of attitude or opinion in a single assessment. Thus, dir ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
7.
Viewpoint - Correspondence regarding 'The choice between a five-point and a ten-point scale in the framework of customer satisfaction research', by Pedro S. Coelho and Susana P. Esteves
James Rothman, Pedro S. Coelho and Susana P. Esteves, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 49, No. 5, 2007, pp.546-550
This Viewpoint article comprises an exchange of correspondence between James Rothman, a former editor of IJMR, and Pedro S. Coelho and Susana P. Esteves, New University of Lisbon, in response to their ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
8.
The choice between a five-point and a ten-point scale in the framework of customer satisfaction measurement
Pedro S. Coelho and Susana P. Esteves, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2007, pp.313-339
In marketing research, and particularly in the context of customer satisfaction measurement, we often try to measure attitudes and human perceptions. This raises a number of questions regarding approp ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
9.
The Effects of Visual Enhancement on Attribute/Benefit Desirability and Brand Perception Measures: Implications for Reliability and Validity
Kevin J. Clancy and Samuel Rabino, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 47, No. 1, Mar 2007, pp.95-102
Advertising, marketing, and public opinion researchers routinely query survey respondents about tangible and intangible product attributes and benefits along two dimensions: desirability or importance ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
10.
Can cross-national/cultural studies presume etic equivalency in respondents' use of extreme categories of Likert rating scales?
Catherine Roster, Gerald Albaum and Robert Rogers, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2006, pp.741-759
The purpose of this study was to determine differences in extreme response to rating scales between cultures/nations in a measure of corporate reputation. Separate surveys examined differences in resp ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
User rating:
Paper
11.
An empirical test of six stated importance measures
Keith Chrzan and Natalia Golovashkina, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2006, pp.717-740
This paper reports on a web-based commercial customer satisfaction study consisting of 1284 respondents, which measured stated attribute importance using six different methods (importance ratings, con ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
12.
Comparing methods of brand image measurement
Carl Driesener and Jenni Romaniuk, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2006, pp.681-698
This study compared rating, ranking and ‘pick-any’ measures of brand image associations. The pick-any technique is a free response measure, where respondents are given an attribute as a cue and asked ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
User rating:
Paper
13.
Maximum difference scaling for a more refined insight in consumer preferences - an example from the automotive industry
Frank Berkers and Maureen Bannink, ESOMAR, Innovate! Conference, Shanghai, May 2006
Maxdiff is claimed to be a promising method, better than classical ranking methods and even proclaimed a 'poor man's conjoint', easy to use and interpret. Can it live up to these promises, or is it ac ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
14.
An examination of the stability of operationalisations of multi-item marketing scales.
Khurram J. Sharif, Samuel Sarpong Jr and Stavros P. Kalafatis, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2005, pp.255-266
Since the publication of Churchill’s (1979) paper in which he proposed a ‘paradigm’ for the construction of multi-item scales, scholars have developed a considerable number of such scales designed to ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
15.
Efficiently measuring opinions in the capital market
Luiz Fernando Lopes Filho, Elaine Restier, Eduardo Werneck and Luiz Sa Lucas, ESOMAR, Annual Congress, Lisbon, Sept 2004
The paper describes briefly how respondent different scale usage may affect the analysis of results derived from discrete scales such as those commonly used in marketing research. Those effects are es ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
16.
On the cross-national generalisability and equivalence of advertising response scales developed in the USA
Albert Caruana, Michael T. Ewing and George M Zinkhan, International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2002, pp.323-343
In this rapidly globalising world economy, cross-cultural research and knowledge about how consumers in different countries perceive television advertising is particularly relevant and important. If c ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
17.
A Practical Learning about Online Research: Attribute Rating Scale Type Effects
Jaci Jarret Masztal and Allen Hogg, Advertising Research Foundation Workshops, Online Research, October 2001, pp.11-21
This article reports on a study into how respondents are asked to grade their preferences in Web-based surveys and questionnaires. In particular, it examines whether presenting options (such as stongl ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
18.
Four subtle sins in scale development: some suggestions for strengthening the current paradigm
Dawn Pearcy and Leisa Reinecke Flynn, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2001
Despite continuing advances in statistical methods, problems in scalar measures persist. This paper reports the findings on a review of marketing scale batteries developed since the publication of Chu ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
19.
The Likert scale revisited
Gerald Albaum, International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 39, No. 2, 1997
This study examined the effect of alternative scale formats on reporting of intensity of attitudes on Likert scales of agreement. A standard one-stage format and an alternate two-stage format were tes ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
20.
OBSERVATIONS: A new approach to measuring product category membership
Arthur J. Adams and Stuart Van Auken, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 35, No. 5, September/October 1995
Reviews the methods used to determine how a brand is positioned within a category and measure the effectiveness of this positioning. The study emphasises the limitations of current methods, and recomm ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This
Paper
21.
Formulation of an index of propensity to buy
L J Rothman, International Journal of Market Research
This paper, which won the MRS Gold Medal in 1964, proposes a method of developing a scale measuring individuals' propensities to buy a brand. The theoretical shape of this scale is first discussed. Pr ...

Summary | Full Text | More Like This


1          Page:Previous


 home  •  subscribe  •  free trial  •  contact us  •  warc mobile  •    ©2010 Copyright and Database Rights owned by Warc
  |    |  
Subjects