Do clicks, likes and shares tell the whole story?
In this guest blog, Clare Hill, managing director of the CMA, looks at the challenges facing brands and agencies as they seek to prove ROI for their content marketing output.
For the latest in our series of content marketing reports we have chosen to explore one of the more contentious topics in the content marketing world – measurement.
The theory runs that following the digital revolution, which began in earnest a decade or so ago, measurement became pivotal to content marketing. So marketers began to obsess over page impressions, clicks, and more recently since the arrival of social media, shares and likes. Less tangible notions of say brand awareness, became slightly devalued.
This is a guest blog from Lisa Menaldo, UK Managing Director, Sublime Skinz
"Fraud ultimately follows dollars," Scott Knoll, Chief Executive and President of Integral Ad Science, rightly explained at this year's dmexco conference.
With the mobile advertising industry booming and global spend set to top $100bn by the end of this year, it's no surprise mobile ad fraud is hanging onto its coat tails. The latest figures suggest up to 34% of programmatic mobile impressions are at risk from fraud, including banners, interstitials, and video ads. And although many fraudulent practises have their roots in desktop, emerging and more sophisticated techniques specific to mobile platforms are increasingly on the rise.
There has been a significant amount of attention placed on the decline in NFL viewing this season. While there are many theories as to what has driven this outcome, we have reviewed data from Nielsen covering the first five weeks of the season to look at various sources of decline. Most importantly, we note that while total NFL game viewing is down by -14.6% per person this year vs. last, college football game viewing is essentially flat, and total viewing of TV from all sources is slightly up. This indicates that the decline is specific to the NFL.
Within viewing for the league’s games, we can further identify that declines are more pronounced among people in Blue Collar homes vs. people in White Collar homes, among people in lower income homes vs. higher income homes, and among homes with White heads of household vs. Black heads of household. However, we emphasize that most of the noticeable differences in segment-level declines we looked at are relatively marginal, typically not more than a few percentage points.
It may soon be time to add another acronym to your collection as mixed reality (MR) heaves into view. As part of Innovation Week, the week-long event being run by OMD UK, Arthur Tindsley and Frazer Hurrell, creative technologists at AOL's Partner Studio in London, demonstrated Microsoft's HoloLens and outlined how it differs from augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) options.
The trade press overflows with interesting predictions about the future of advertising.
But there's a problem.
Experts, marketing or otherwise, have an awful record of predictions. Philip Tetlock, a psychologist at the University of Pennsylvania, ran a 20-year study that analysed 82,361 forecasts from 284 experts. He found that their predictions were as likely to be wrong, as right. In his memorable phrase, the average pundit fared no better than 'a dart-throwing monkey'.
It's not just that these marketing predictions misguide us. There's also an opportunity cost. Our fixation with the future crowds out an interest in the past. Yet there is value in looking backwards to people who grappled with similar problem to ours.
So let's take a look at one current problem, turning data into insights, and look back to what we can learn from the 1940s. In particular, the experience of one man: Abraham Wald.
As the world around us changes at an incredible pace, you don't need to be a marketing genius to see that the relationships between people and brands are, changing. There has been an explosion in digital messaging, which has led to reduced attention, recall and emotional engagement. Where people once leant in to brand stories, it's now increasingly a case of talk to the hand.
At HeyHuman, we believe that this mind-set requires us to embrace science to a greater to degree as per the recent WARC article 'Creative Agencies Need to Tap Science'. But how can we do this?
It’s a question we’ve all asked ourselves as we scroll through yet another smug status update or toss our phone across the room because we didn't match a row of colourful candy: is all this digital distraction actually good for us? One thing’s for sure: digital media has been blamed for a lot of society’s ills. And that’s despite its massive - and increasing - global popularity, with one piece of research showing that we touch our phones an average of 2,500 times daily, with 80% of our time spent on just five apps.
Two of digital's most-popular by-products, social media and gaming, were put under the microscope by a series of speakers at Unfolded, an event organised by London-based creative agency Fold7 and held yesterday night. First up was Professor Robin Dunbar, an Oxford academic and creator of Dunbar's Number, which suggests that humans can comfortably maintain only 150 stable relationships. Then came Helen Lewis, deputy editor of political magazine The New Statesman and inventor of another social metric: Lewis' law holds that "the comments on any article about feminism justify feminism". Also speaking were Martin Talks, founder of Digital Detoxing - a company that takes participants on activity holidays on the proviso they leave their devices behind - and cyber psychologist Berni Good, an academic expert on gaming.
With a world of information and entertainment at our fingertips, expectations of immediacy are higher than ever – but so too is the desire to connect with others. Social media is a powerful force for brand building, and one which is destined to become even more important in future.
This is a guest blog from Alison Martin, Director, Kantar Worldpanel
It might not be as sexy as virtual reality or robots but, at this year's CES, grocery e-commerce has been the trend that's grabbed the interest of many marketers.
While by no means a mature market – Latin America and large parts of Asia need to address issues of infrastructure before it can thrive, and it has yet to make a serious impact in the US – it is fast becoming a going concern in an otherwise stagnant industry. Online FMCG sales continue to grow, up by 15% globally in 2016, and, by 2025, is projected to command a 9% value share of global spend on groceries.