Pinpoint the case evidence you need – search by industry, objective, media and more.
Creative TV and video executions from the most innovative and market-leading brands.
Browse campaigns from the world's leading advertising and marketing effectiveness awards.
The latest from our annual case study competitions.
Our ranking of the world's best marketing campaigns and companies.
Browse Warc by subject.
Brands & branding
Consumer research & insight
Media channels & touchpoints
Key Warc papers on marketing best practice.
In-depth analysis of 200 global brand owners.
Develop your skills as a marketing strategist.
Compare your ROI with the Warc database.
Get the edge you need in new business.
Latest reports from Warc and trusted partners offering unique insights into current trends.
The driving forces behind consumer behaviour.
New developments for industries and sectors.
Strategic insight for the marketing of brands.
Media & Tech
Latest innovations in media and technology.
Insight and intelligence for countries and regions.
Daily coverage of key developments for marketers worldwide.
The Warc Blog
Insights, opinions and fresh new thinking from our team of bloggers around the world.
Overview of databases, forecasts and reports.
Annual ad expenditure data for 96 markets.
Media Costs Database
Compare costs by media and target audience.
International and Consensus ad forecasts.
Trends by primary media and second screen.
Global Marketing Index
A monthly indicator of the state of the industry.
Key briefings from major conferences and events in the US, Europe and Asia Pacific.
Plan your schedule of must-attend events with our global calendar of conferences.
Learn how to tackle key marketing challenges from leading experts in our series of in-depth webinars.
Content & Partners
What Our Clients Say
Request a Trial
For our market-leading publications and events
Contact us on +1 202 778 0680
Do I Subscribe?
The Warc Blog
The Warc Blog
Feedback / Complaints
Other Blogs We Like
Account Planning Group UK
Account Planning Methods
ANA: Marketing Musings
Brand Keys: The Keyhole
Garfield at Large
Harvard Business Review
Joe la pompe
Market Research Society
One Size Fits One
Straight Talk with Nigel Hollis
The Warc Blog
How should market research react to social influence?
, Senior Manager Consumer Insights, Coca Cola Gmbh
I recently read an excellent article in the January 2013 issue of
on the role social influence has on our preferences.
The authors - Colin Strong, Paul Ormerod and Alex Bentley - quote an experiment conducted by Microsoft, showing how strongly influenced teenagers music preferences were by a social component, in this instance the ability to see how many times a song had already been downloaded by others. The difference between this group and one that hadn't had access to any social influence was marked - amongst those that were "influenced" only a few songs were highly popular, the majority of songs received very low ratings. Amongst those who didn't have access to the number of downloads available, the preference spread was much broader.
The message was clear: having access to others' opinions had a heavy skew on preference. Mark Earls makes similar points in
I'll Have What She's Having
- we are social animals, indeed "perhaps the most powerful influencer on human behaviour is other people" as he states on his website.
What does the above mean for Market Research? Should we never ask individuals opinions on their own, as essentially opinions are a socially formed construct? Here's my take.
1. Methodologies should continually improve in Replicating Real-Life Situations
This may appear obvious - that we should aim methodologically to get as close as possible to mimicking a real-life situation or replicating a decision making process. However, take a concept test: ideally, we would need to understand to what extent an individual respondent is more influencer or influenced - and who precisely are those are that influence him or her? Take any purchasing decision: before beginning on the diagnostic journey, we need to establish per respondent if for a given category this is a decision they (believe they) take on their own or jointly, with somebody else, however loosely? If the latter, then we would need to find out who that person is, and ideally bind them in into the evaluation process. Curious if anyone is aware of such processes going on already, and if so I'd be interested in details on the cost and timing ramifications.
2. Research needs to be an Ongoing Exercise
In a world of ongoing budgetary-pressures, it's an odd thing to suggest, but essentially we need to re-examine the frequency with which we undertake all studies, including strategic ones like U&As and brand trackers, and ask if it is adequate. More than ever, we are trying focus our lens on subjects that won't sit still. Online influence is happening all the time, more and more people are reading blogs, reviews, ratings - the likelihood is that opinions are increasingly swayed more frequently, and that traditional tenets about the robustness about brand imagery may becoming dated.
3. The pressure to merge Behavioural Data with Attitudinal Measures will increase.
Most of us believe we have our own opinions, preferences, beliefs. Much of what the article quoted suggests, as does Behavioural Economics, is that we don't really have access to our decision making processes. Asking us questions is fine - we have an image of ourselves, that's an important piece of data - but we increasingly need to look at the behavioural evidence of the same person for a methodological reality check. How long will it be before sampling methods allow us to easily match behavioural data with attitudinal data, I wonder? The two need merging sooner rather than later.
: thought-provoking work coming from the broad area of Behavioural Economics has again made me appreciate the complexity of what we set out to do as professionals - understand and predict behaviour - whilst sensitizing to the fragility of some of our tools.
It's potentially overwhelming: our subjects' viewpoints are fleeting, contextually derived and influenced highly by people who we probably haven't included in our datasets. Hmm.
It's important to remember that however complex the world is, however many cognitive biases we are aware of, Management is looking to MR to help solve problems, essentially to simplify, not highlight potential complexities that we don't have the answers to.
To continue thriving, Market Research needs to outline the limitations and constraints of the methodology employed, and within that be bold and articulate in stating our views, recommendation Actions.
Curious, as ever, as to others' views.
17 February 2013 17:59
comments on this blog
Just so you know, the Watts Salganik experiment was done while Watts was still teaching at Columbia. Also, it's cited in lots of other places (e.g. HERD) and dates back to 2006. Just FYI
12 March 2013 at 4:16pm
Add your comment here:
Posting your comment.... please wait
Three ways brands can tackle mobile ad fraud
It all begins with a brief
TV Trends: The Missing NFL Viewers
OMD Innovation Week: From AR to VR to MR
Four data lessons from history
Point of view: The social media detox
Time to synchronise
Beats by Dre: R/GA - Old school marketing to a new generation
Limber Up: Strategy & Planning – The Agile Way
Hover cars, branded content and guanxi at Cannes' China Day
Get daily news
Do I subscribe?
Request a trial